My distinction between self-consciousness and self-awareness may be confusing, so I will explain; self-consciousness is an undue awareness of oneself, appearance, or one's actions. What someone who is very self-conscious will struggle with is feeling everything they do in a very inflated, negative way. They will feel people scrutinizing them very harshly, when really, nobody is looking. Alternatively, what somebody who is very self-aware will NOT struggle with is taking that projected scrutiny harshly. They will have overcome a feeling of insecurity brought on by self consciousness by taking the things they are self-conscious about into consideration, working with them, asking themselves questions, and answering them. They are very rounded and complete, they have become their own reference-guide for the world. They understand how they are really viewed by others, and know that they don't mind all that much.
What this has to do with Wes anderson's filmmaking can be seen very clearly in the visuals. In this shot for example:

The movement of the characters through the frame works with the dialogue and story arch of the scene. Kristofferson (right) begins on the far right side of the frame and talks to a very highly-placed Ash (top). After Ash yells at Kristofferson, he lays on the floor, but is graphically placed underneath the table. This placement makes him look trapped, and beaten (below)

At this point, Kristofferson starts to cry. Ash points his flashlight at him to inspect, and feels some measure of sympathy. At this point, he climbs down the ladder, turns on the trainset and they both reside together at the bottom left-corner of the frame.

Proximity and placement are two principles that are in use here, and this is much of Wes Anderson's style. The characters are in one place at the beginning of the shot, and move to another at the resolution. This approach is actually quite minimal, but also very successful and likable. If I am being quite honest, the ease with which it can be analyzed makes you feel pretty smart. It is in all of Wes Anderson's films. The success of this style, however, is not just the simple novelty of turning anybody into an astute art critic. It is a result of Anderson's passion for effective visuals in his films. He is somebody who aspires to be a filmmaker that uses the medium to its fullest, and does so by concocting a go-to method to compose his shots. This kind self-reliance and confidence is very familiar in the world of cool, smart, successful nerds that I mentioned earlier.
Anyways, analyzing the visuals in a Wes Anderson movie is kind of low-hanging fruit. A common theme among the protagonists in the three movies I watched is that they are all very self-committed and seem to have bloated egos that remain even through the resolution. Seve Zissou is a marine biologist that wants to kill a shark that killed his friend. He puts himself and others at risk to do so. Mr. Fox is a confident criminal mastermind who wants to steal from three extremely wealthy farmers. He put himself and others at risk to do so. comparing Sam, from Moonrise kingdom to the other two feels like a stretch, but he still is technically putting himself and others at risk to pursue his love. All of them include stop motion in some measure and seem equally cynical and Noire. They're all kind of bouncy and goofy, but still dark and profound.
Overall, I think Wes Anderson Stands out and has very likable films for the reasons I mentioned above.
No comments:
Post a Comment